Log on:
Powered by Elgg

Paul Coyne :: Blog :: Archives

October 2007

October 01, 2007

The US National School Boards Association recently completed and published (July 2007) a studyAdobepdf Pdf (928 KB) of nine- to seventeen-year olds and their use of social media as well as the role of social media in education. It comprised of three surveys: an online survey of 1,277 nine- to 17-year-old students, an online survey of 1,039 parents and telephone interviews with 250 school district leaders who make decisions on Internet policy.

The kids are heavy users of social media.
  • 96% of students with online access use social media, 81% in the past three months.
Many of them are using social media for educational reasons.
  • 50% of students use social media to talk about schoolwork; and

  • 59% use social media to talk about education-related topics
    like college or college planning, politics, news, careers and religion/morals.

And most schools are requiring the use of the Internet to complete assignments.

  • 96% of school districts have teachers who assign projects that require the Internet;

  • 95% have teachers who use web sites to communicate assignments and other course-related information;

  • Nearly 50% have international pen pal programs/online partnerships with other schools;

  • 35% have student blog programs; and 22% use wikis for school projects.

"Doing 'Nothing' online" from Cartoons - The New York Times

Doingnothing


Filed under: digital native, education, eLearning, learning, social media

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

October 05, 2007


Just announced, "the all new DCMI Community for Scholarly Communications established at the recent DCMI Advisory Board meeting in Singapore. The aim of the group is to provide a central place for individuals and organisations to exchange information, knowledge and general discussion on issues relating to using Dublin Core for describing items of 'scholarly communications', be they research papers, conference presentations, images, data objects." Various Authors, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, October 5, 2007 [Tags: Academic Publications, Research] [Link] [Comment]

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

October 16, 2007


Facebook seems to be coming up everywhere the past few weeks. The most recent, which finally got me to post, was a Stephen Downes post - I'm Majoring in Facebook, How about You? He points us to a Fortune Magazine article that describes a Stanford class being offered by BJ Fogg that studies Facebook as a platform:
"Facebook is the most convenient and respectable way to feel connected to friends, get updated on existing friends, find new people, build relationships and express identities."
Students, however, seem more interested in cashing out. "I want to build a really cool app and then sell it for some amount of money," says Jennifer Gee, a 21-year-old computer science graduate student. Classmates nearby nod in agreement.
The class has each student creating applications in Facebook and presenting to potential investors. Interestingly, BJ Fogg (the professor) came onto my radar a few years ago because he was writing about persuasive technology - i.e., how do you persuade humans to behave a certain way with technology - a key component of human performance improvement through technology.

Why is Facebook so hot right now? I see two main reasons which I give below, but first ...

What is Facebook?

Facebook is a pretty simple application with fairly standard social network functionality. At the core, Facebook allows you to:
  • Create a profile
  • Link to your friends
  • See your friends updates and to update your friends
  • Create public or private groups
  • Join groups
  • Hold group conversations (threaded discussions)
While there are a lot of other features, that's about 90% of what people do. In fact, here's a picture of what users do on Facebook (larger circles represent more activity):


It's mostly some pretty simple activities. But because of critical mass, a general ethos of open conversations between friends, filtering of notifications, and control of friendships, it works well as a means of communications within your social network.

What I've found interesting is that I now commonly use LinkedIn to find interesting people, but often use Facebook to communicate with them.

When you look at the core functions of Facebook - it fits pretty well as the basis for a learning platform. More on this below.

So, why is it hot?

Facebook has Your Audience

One of the struggles with any social networking software is overcoming the hurdle of getting users to start using yet another social networking platform. This is something that I've lamented before (see Too Many Social Networks?and Multiple Social Networks).

I was just talking to someone from a very large organization. They had previously tried to get an internal platform for social networking rolled out in the organization and had limited adoption. Then they realized that about half of their workforce were active users of Facebook. And as the old adage goes:
Q: "Willie, why do you rob banks?"
A: "Cause that's where the money is." ~ Willie Sutton - Bank Robber
Why are we going to be adopting Facebook? Cause that's where our users are.

In fact, this makes me wonder if it can overcome a bit of the 1% rule (or even the update to the 1% Rule).

So, instead of trying to get your audience to adopt another platform, adopt Facebook.

Facebook Applications are Simple to Build

If you look at the picture above, the top right Facebook represents interacting with applications. Facebook applications are custom functionality that work seamlessly within the Facebook environment. The code runs on a separate server, but the applications interface plays back inside Facebook. Facebook provides an API that gives you access to friends, groups, etc.

And it's relatively easy to create these applications.

I'm currently engaged with two different clients working on Facebook applications. Why? Well, because the audience is there and we intend to leverage the Facebook platform in order to:
  • Spread virally by asking friends to add the application, notify friends about activity
  • Use groups as the basis for certain kinds of activity (think communication, decision making)

Facebook as a Learning Platform

For the upcoming Free Online Conference - Corporate Learning: Trends and Innovations we wanted to have a way for participants to get to know other participants and hold discussions. While we are going to use Q2 Learning's platform, we could have created a group in Facebook and used the threaded discussion capability there. The advantage of that is that likely a sizable portion of the audience is already on Facebook and thus wouldn't have to upload profile information. This also would allow the relation(friend)ships created during the process to exist beyond the conference.

Choosing Facebook would also give us the possibility of using Facebook as a recruiting vehicle. Through the notification system, friends of attendees will see a message that they are attending the event.

You can do the same thing with Facebook for your organization, group, class, etc. Leverage it as a means of getting the word out, as a social networking layer, as a discussion tool. And, again, your audience is already there.

Of course, there's also some really interesting possibilities because of the ability to create applications. You can think of Facebook as providing a platform that handles authentication, profiles, networks, groups and notifications. If you think about it, there are a lot of applications that could leverage this core capability. I would expect that this is a place where we will see eLearning Startups - New Wave Coming.


 

 

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

October 19, 2007

Extracted from the Pubishing 2.0 blog.

This extract is so timely. The facebook app development news really got my attention and I even started trying to figure out how to do build facebooks apps that pushed data to where people actually are - `be where the puck is` kind of approach (see my last post!). Now I read this from Publishing 2.0 and, wow! I feel like a dodged a bullet there. This really is a common sense notion and I appplaud it. I wonder how many others will pickup on this before millions of dollars are spent on facebook apps?

Time to deconstruct the “platform” hype. On the face of it, developers’ obsession with Facebook Platform makes no sense — build an application on Facebook and you can reach 30 million users. Build it on the web, and you can reach 10 (even 20) times as many users. On Facebook, there are automated mechanisms for apps to spread “virally,” but on the web, there are 1,000 times as many viral mechanisms, which truly killer apps like Google, YouTube, and Facebook itself are able to leverage as they scale users.

So why are developers obsessed with Facebook? Because there are fewer applications on Facebook than there are on the web, so there is less competition — at least for now. That’s it.

Read the rest of “Forget Platforms And Applications, Data Is The Real Asset On the Web” at the Publish2 Blog.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

October 29, 2007

Usually I will give a blow by blow account of my time at conferences like this – sessions attended, new things learned, contacts made and so on. I’m not going to do that this time; I think that would be to miss the point of something much more interesting.

The sessions by themselves varied wildly in quality, depth and usefulness – some were very good, polished, professional pieces of research well presented others less so. The range was wide and there was pretty much something for everyone – even it took four full days to get through it all.

I’ve been attending conferences similar to this for some time now, a lot of them from a private sector, learning and development perspective and others from academic/HEFCE standpoints. The one thing they have in common is a group of people convinced by the power to improve learning and training outcomes through the use of technology. The commitment is terrific and the work universal; from the Middle East to Asia to North and South America and Africa, an awful lot of people are committed to leveraging new technology for the good of the individual and society in general. It’s very encouraging to see.

 
For the record my areas of interest centred on the web 2.0 technologies and their application in a learning context. And here’s the thing; there were an awful lot of sessions devoted to this in one form or another. And another thing, as much as there is talk about the technology, much of the conversations was about which teaching models best support/exploit these technologies. I guess that for me was new – it signalled a move into a next phase and one in which the conversation is not about should we use these technologies to improve learning and research outcomes, but how. I think this is tremendously significant; I think that from a selfish point of view it suggests that the ground will be better prepared in 2008 for conversations with our subscribers about how the InTouch platform might be employed in their institutions. 

So, no one paper especially stood out for me this at this conference but I think I learned something more useful and profound than that; educators and academics around the world are moving towards a different model of teaching and learning in a networked 21st century world. It isn’t going to slow down, indeed to nick that tired old phrase of William Gibson, “The future has arrived, it’s just not evenly distributed”.

This move will have a profound impact on what we do so we should get on with the business of figuring it out.

 

Filed under: conference, elearn2007, elearning, emerald, learning, reports

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share