Log on:
Powered by Elgg

Paul Coyne :: Blog :: Archives

January 2007

January 02, 2007

The current issue of Harvard Business Review has a useful article entitled How Leaders Create and Use Networks by Herminia Ibarra and Mark Hunter. It’s a no-brainer that to succeed in business, you’ve got to take advantage of your network. But not just any old network will do. To be a successful business leader, you must build and maintain three types of networks:

Your Operational Network is made up of the people it takes to get your job done. Most of them are insiders. It’s pretty evident who they are. Your goal is to foster deep working relationships with them.

Your Personal Network are the people who help you develop personally and professionally. They also keep you informed. Most of them are outsiders. They can come from anywhere. Your goal is breadth, not depth, of these relationships

Your Strategic Network becomes more important the higher you go in the organization. These people help you see what the future holds and how to line up stakeholder support. Some come from inside the organzation, some from outside. It’s not obvious who you want to participate: that depends on the strategy. Your goal is to work with people who leverage the linkage between inside and out.

WORKING is part of networking. You shouldn’t blow off networking because you don’t have time.

The authors caution against the common error of spending too much time on tweaking Outlook entries and not enough time picking up the phone. A network only thrives if it is used.

A friend of mine considers himself a great networker. He’s not. Whenever he calls, I know he’s after something. “Hi, how you doing? How’s the wife? You still have those cute dogs? By the way, do you know anyone high up in such and such?” A great networker calls when he doesn’t need anything.

Networking is not in most people’s comfort zone, but it’s a good investment of time on a cost-benefit basis.

In 2007, nurture your networks with InTouch.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

The Slashdot site this morning writes "Wikipedia has blocked the entire country of Qatar from editing pages. Whilst the ban is due to spam-abuse coming from the IP address in question, the fact that this belongs to the country's sole high-speed internet provider has the unintended consequence of stopping Qatarese from editing the wiki. The ban has raised concerns about impartiality — the majority of Al Jazeera journalists operate out of Qatar, for example. This raises a number of issues about internet connectivity in small countries — what other internet bottlenecks like this exist?".

Sure it raises those questions. I think it also raises questions about the very idea of content and information services available to all for free and open to editing by anyone, anywhere.

I remember when the web started to take a foothold in mainstream life in the early/mid 90s. Then the worry was that commercial enterprises would drive out the free open exchange of ideas principles upon which the web was founded by scientists and academics. The emergence of tools like Wikis and Blogs remind me a little of that, and I think for a while there has been as sense that perhaps the web can become what was promised then - Open Access Journals, WikiPedia, Blogs, YouTube and so on are free at the point of use, indeed free to create your own content.

Thing is, much of the free stuff is pretty awful. It has no real value to me and I certainly can't trust it. I believe 2007 will become a year when trust in content becomes a major issue. Where does your content come from? Who wrote it? What credentials does the author possess? Why should I believe what I have just read?

 

 

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

Great start to the New Year - find out if you're cut out for it here

Feel I must point out that I'm not really a geek, in spite of what everyone says... 

My results, which I'm overly chuffed with to be honest:


You are Spider-Man

Spider-Man
75%
Superman
65%
Supergirl
58%
The Flash
55%
Green Lantern
50%
Iron Man
50%
Wonder Woman
48%
Robin
37%
Hulk
35%
Batman
35%
Catwoman
30%
You are intelligent, witty,
a bit geeky and have great
power and responsibility.
Click here to take the Superhero Personality Test

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

January 17, 2007

http://education.guardian.co.uk/elearning/story/0,,1992344,00.html?gusr Open courseware, where some of the world's best universities are offering free teaching, learning and research resources online, is a growing phenomenon. But will British universities embrace it? Shola Adenekan reports.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

January 19, 2007

http://education.guardian.co.uk/training/story/0,,1993728,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=8

Graduate teachers are more professional and better able to control pupil behaviour but are less skilled in applying their subject knowledge to teaching, a new report reveals.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/students/news/story/0,,1994439,00.html? A legal row at Exeter University between the Christian union and the student guild has wider implications for the future of faith on campus. Chaminda Jayanetti and Liz Ford report.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

January 22, 2007

In this week's Digital Planet, we talk to the author of an EU report about the true value of the open source industry and meet the men behind Streamburst - a new way to allow TV and film downloads without using DRM but still protecting copyright. Plus: bloggers - can they beat big business? And we talk to the makers of IT road movie In Search of the Valley.

Filed under: Digital, Global, ICT, Learning

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

January 23, 2007

http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,,1996170,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=8

The government's aim to renew buildings using private finance is proving complex and hard to manage. Martin Wainwright and Polly Curtis report.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/comment/story/0,,1996139,00.html Academics must guard against losing their voice, says Sally Hunt.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/further/opinion/story/0,,1996137,00.htm Who will pay for adult skills, asks Mark Corney.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/tefl/story/0,,1996207,00.html?gusrc=rss Level of response surprises organisers in protest over loss of free language tuition. Peter Kingston reports.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

January 24, 2007

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/news/story/0,,1997594,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=8

Climate change will soon be hitting hard, but Britain's students plan to carry on flying, finds survey.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/careers/story/0,,1997598,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=8

Patrick Stewart, the actor famous for his roles in X-Men and Star Trek, appointed visiting professor of theatre at Oxford.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,,1997209,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=8

Thousands of children in deprived areas are to be given pedometers to encourage them to walk more, improve their fitness and keep their weight down.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

Learning Circuits has pubilshed Jay Cross' recent thoughts on building an ecology to support informal (and formal) learning.

Excerpt:

Informal learning is about situated action, collaboration, coaching, and reflection, not study and reading. Developing a platform to support informal learning is analogous to landscaping a garden. A major component of informal learning is natural learning, the notion of treating people as organisms in nature. Our role as learning professionals is to protect their environment, provide nutrients for growth, and let nature take its course. Self-service learners connect to one another, to ongoing flows of information and work, to their teams and organizations, to their customers and markets, not to mention their families and friends.

Because the design of informal learning ecosystems is analogous to landscape design, I will call the environment of informal learning a learnscape. A landscape designer’s goal is to conceptualize a harmonious, unified, pleasing garden that makes the most of the site at hand. A learnscaper strives to create a learning environment that increases the organization’s longevity and health, and the individual learner’s happiness and well-being. Gardeners don’t control plants; managers don’t control people. Gardeners and managers have influence but not absolute authority. They can’t make a plant fit into the landscape or a person fit into a team.

A learnscape is a learning ecology. It’s learning without borders.


Designing a Web-Based Learning Ecology

Informal Learning

Informal learning fundamentally reframes the learning process. For sixty years, we’ve thought of learning as residing in the formal models exemplified by schools, universities, and training programs. Common to these top-down formats is a curriculum that rests on the beliefs and worldview of the authorities in charge.

Informal learning is more democratic. It’s responsive to learners and often ad hoc. It’s not the opposite of formal learning so much as a different range on the spectrum of all learning. Most learning incorporates a bit of formal along with some of the informal kind.

Those who look at the world through industrial-age goggles devalue the unseen, informal aspects of learning. Thus, the age of intangibles dawns on organizations where informal learning is but an afterthought. Righting the balance of formal and informal requires a fresh approach to instructional design.

Even if you subscribe to the ADDIE* model, you’ll have to admit that it’s tough to apply when the future is unpredictable, the content emergent, and implementation learner-directed. In a world of fluid content, programs that describe the status quo are so, well, yesterday. Let me share a glimpse of an alternative approach to channeling learning.

 



*ADDIE = Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate.

Learnscaping

Informal learning is about situated action, collaboration, coaching, and reflection, not study and reading. Developing a platform to support informal learning is analogous to landscaping a garden. A major component of informal learning is natural learning, the notion of treating people as organisms in nature. Our role as learning professionals is to protect their environment, provide nutrients for growth, and let nature take its course. Self-service learners connect to one another, to ongoing flows of information and work, to their teams and organizations, to their customers and markets, not to mention their families and friends.

Because the design of informal learning ecosystems is analogous to landscape design, I will call the environment of informal learning a learnscape. A landscape designer’s goal is to conceptualize a harmonious, unified, pleasing garden that makes the most of the site at hand. A learnscaper strives to create a learning environment that increases the organization’s longevity and health, and the individual learner’s happiness and well-being. Gardeners don’t control plants; managers don’t control people. Gardeners and managers have influence but not absolute authority. They can’t make a plant fit into the landscape or a person fit into a team.

A learnscape is a learning ecology. It’s learning without borders. Let me provide an example.

 

The Learnscape of the February Workshops

This weekend I’ve been pruning and adding amendments to the learnscape for the upcoming ASTD workshop on Learning with Blogs, Wikis, and Web 2.0. Working on the web is exhilarating. In fact, as I write these words, I’m in a flow state, words appearing on screen as if by magic and my clock frozen in time. New approaches are challenging.

Putting things together, I’m not designing learning experiences. Rather, I’m sculpting an environment in which I hope great learning will evolve. It’s a holistic endeavor. It’s also incremental. The web is a wonderfully forgiving place to prototype. The February sessions are the fourth set of unworkshops, yet we’re still making frequent improvements. Participants in last year’s Unworkshops used a wiki as home base. It proved to be too much, too soon. So next month we’ll be using a combination of chat board, group blog, and shared online documents; it rocks. (We realized there is no center in a network and want to get that lesson across.) Along the way, we experimented with several packaged learning environments and Backpack but determined that cobbling together our own package would make for better learning down the road.

Outcomes

While I intend to let the Unworkshops evolve, I still need to think ahead with the end in mind. Am I raising flowers or tomatoes? I’m assuming participants will attend with intentions of

  • becoming proficient in finding and trying new applications on the web
  • getting the big picture of bottom-up informal learning
  • understanding the role of blogs, wikis, podcasts, tags, RSS in learning
  • relating the best web-solution to a given learning need
  • participating and learning in an online community.

Technology

Working with web technology enables you to build and implement solutions incrementally. It’s often simple and inexpensive to create a prototype application and test it as a proof of concept, reducing what once took thousands of dollars and months of time to something you can do in less than a day. For free. However, you’re not going to learn how to do this without practice and reflection.

This is why our Learnscape uses only free software. It’s simpler to learn and it’s readily available. Our expectation is that after our month together, participants will be tinkering and experimenting with software they were introduced to in the Unworkshop. Participants also have free access to our resource center for the following year. The February workshop will be using Vyew, Skype, Google-Docs, QuickTopic, pbWiki, Del.icio.us, Flickr, Authenticity, WordPress, both as examples and to deliver the Unworkshop experience itself.

Structure

Unworkshops are participatory. We have coaches, not instructors. Participants receive guidance, not assignments. Our subject matter is fluid, not fixed.

Our entire group meets online Tuesdays in a row from noon until 1:30 Eastern time, starting February 6. These sessions are the most formal part of the package. We share tricks of the trade, where to find things, tips on internet culture, and case examples. The Tuesday meetings build the scaffolding on which to hang subsequent discoveries.

  • Our first group session builds confidence in navigating the web. Participants tour our agenda, schedules, exercises, locations, research, communication, chat, and FAQ. They learn how to connect with others, search for information, and get help when they need it. They learn how to use the web for personal information management and are introduced to informal learning theory. They become familiar with the learnscape.
  • Our next sessions get to the heart of web tools, techniques, and conventions. Podcasts, communities, tags, subscriptions. We explore the functions and capabilities of web 2.0, all of the items in the Informal Learning Toolbox. These sessions marry the web toolset with learning requirements. Building learnscapes. Applications.
  • Our final session deals with community. Alumni are invited to participate. We go over resources, how to’s. Continuing interest groups form. Novices are initiated into the club.

In addition, five-person learning teams meet several days before each group session. These online meetings are participants’ primary means of hands-on exploration. Teams collaboratively investigate techniques and solve group challenges (e.g. “Tour these web sites and discuss their utility in learning with your Team”). Teams share their findings with everyone in the Unworkshop by blogging their results. Team blogs are aggregated on the Unworkshop website for all to see. This is where we expect most of the learning to take place.

To monitor quality, each team provides feedback weekly. Participants are encouraged to explore on their own. Our resources are plentiful.

Personal coaches are available for one-on-one conversations, but you will have to ask. The Unworkshop is based on Pull learning rather than having everything Pushed to you. Our hot lines on Skype are available whenever the coaching team is awake.

Scaffolding

Our first Unworkshops spewed so much information, I’m surprised everyone survived. (It probably required gallons of coffee.) Now we provide customizable job aids as outboard memory. For example, our first session deals with Personal Knowledge Management. Some people will set up a home page with Google or Netvibes. People who prefer to design their own can download this starter sheet and edit it with Google-Docs.

Unconclusion

This learnscape is not over, but, then, learnscapes never are. Seasons change, people grow, and climate shifts. Unlike design, evolution is open-ended.

Blogged with Flock

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2007/01/preparing-for-astd-techknowledge.html

I saw a post by Bill Ives - Conference Blogs on the Rise:
Individuals have blogged about conferences for some time. It seems now that more conference events are sponsoring these blogs and trying to aggregate those blogging the conference. It is a way to start the event on a virtual basis prior to the start and then continue the conversations afterwards and provide an archive for what happen and what people thought about it.
It made me think back to an earlier post Be an Insanely Great Professional Conference Attendee. The biggest idea in that post is to come prepare with interesting questions to ask other attendees that would spark conversations. And, Bill's post made me realize that likely there were people talking about the conference in blogs prior to the conference. So, quick search found the following:
Pretty small list. It appears that relatively few bloggers will be presenting at ASTD TechKnowledge in Las Vegas as compared to the eLearningGuild's Annual Conference in Boston. Still, it does give some food for thought by surfing around the blogs of these folks.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

January 25, 2007

http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,,1998482,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=8

Schools minister pours scorn on comprehensives and bemoans the demise of grammar schools.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,,1998644,00.html?gusrc= Teachers welcome the government's push to teach British values, but warn it would do little to help disadvantaged youngsters who continue to underachieve.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/worldwide/story/0,,1998648,00.ht Up to four people have been killed and at least 25 injured in clashes between students in Lebanon, it is reported.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/further/story/0,,1998598,00.html?gusrc= College principals demand changes to new system for measuring performance because they say it penalises academic success.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/tefl/viewfromabroad/story/0,,1998465,00 Being constantly stared at is a small price to pay for good students, good pay and a good experience teaching English in China, says Alison Jewitt

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2007/01/hard-finding-good-developers-designers.html

I just saw a post by Karl Kapp that discusses the fact that there's a shortage of IT professionals. Some facts he cites:
  • In September 2006, IT employment stood at 3,667,100 up 4.2% from 2005 (an all time high)
  • 79 percent of IT workers work in IT-reliant companies (health care and financial services, industries enabled by IT but not focused on IT)
  • From 2000 to 2004, the number of incoming US undergraduates planning to major in Computer Science dropped by 60%.
  • Estimated 1.5 million new computer and IT related job opening between 2002 and 2012

Based on my personal experience in hiring people in Los Angeles and based on the complaints of my fellow members of the Los Angeles CTO Forum, this already has real impact on us. We simply can't find people to fill positions. And off-shore is not always appropriate. I've talked about this issue before in: Computer Science Dying in the US?

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2007/01/astd-techknowledge-if-you-are-going.html

I will be at ASTD TechKnowledge in a couple of weeks in Las Vegas. If you will be attending (and are reading this blog entry), then a couple of things:
  1. It would be interesting to me and likely to other readers of this blog to see who is attending who also reads this blog (and presumably others). Please drop a comment if you are going.

  2. On the 31st or 1st we will be having a dinner with some interesting folks to ramble on about topics that are discussed in this blog. If you are interested in going, include that in your comment.

  3. My sessions are on “Personal and Collaborative Learning Using Blogs and Social Bookmarking†– one is an introduction, the other two are hands-on. It would be nice to know if any readers of this blog are planning to attend.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2007/01/new-lms.html

More discussion occuring in blogs around a new kind of LMS. Lee Kraus has various ideas about the new LMS:

It will most likely will not be a destination. It is there when you need it and gone when you don't.
I almost agree with Lee on this, but I do think there will be destination or at least a guide that can be brought up to provide suggestions about learning opportunities, resources, additional content that relates to what you are viewing.
It will track or pull data from many different web services. i.e. your feedreader, flickr, or youtube.
I agree that it will be somewhat agnostic about the content that will be considered part of learning, but there will be a big issue about tagging pages and events that are considered part of learning. It won't be sufficient to visit any page about a topic in order to get "credit."
It will not be an HR system.
Not sure I get this. It can be driven by HR, learning or a business unit.
It will both generate and store a lot of the meta-data about learning.
It will allow other systems to integrate workflow, learning content, and social interaction on top of it.
It will foster single user adoption and empower that user within any environment.
I completely agree with these comments.

Brent raises some interesting questions about what it will look like. He refers to it as a Learning Dashboard. But I believe it can be a destination, i.e., a learning dashboard, but it should also be capable as being a guide as you complete other things. In fact, when you look at the discussion around Web 3.0, part of it is showing what relates to what you are looking at. There's an opportunity to do this based on learning paths within limited context.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2007/01/community-blogs-maybe-im-finally.html

I've been working with Dave Lee on the Learning Circuits Blog (LCB) for about 8 months now. About two months into it, I finally began to understand that the LCB was different than an individual blog because it was designed to serve a community. As such it allowed members who didn't have a blog to post, it attracted a broader audience and more comments than individual blogs, and most importantly it served as a central location for the community for publishing and comment. Thus, was born the concept for The Big Question - a monthly question that everyone in the community would post and comment their answers, provide discussion, etc.

Dave and I are still trying to figure out exactly what this means, but I just ran across a couple of others that got me thinking about this again: The Philadelphia eLearning SIG Blog and The Seattle Captivate User Group Blog.

Both blogs serve the needs of their community. In discussing the blog with Ben Cragio from Phlesig, he says that this looks to be a great tool for the community:

1 - Cover more topics than we could possibly cover in 6 - 12 annual meetings a year.

2 - Item #1 allows us to respond to the specific interests of our group. As a member of our e-SIG (and this is true in most technology user groups), it's quite likely that a topic you might be interested in, that talks directly to the work you are doing or where you are going, simply won't be addressed over the course of the year. Or it may be addressed too late.

3 - Get more members involved with the e-SIG.

4 - Increase the stickiness of the e-SIG by allowing people to maintain and add
connections in between meetings.

5 - Continue the dialogue in between meetings.

6 - Help steer better presentations to our physical meetings. Comments, voting and stats provide excellent guidance into what topics are in demand.

7 - We're an e-SIG so we should be using e-Learning! This blog is an informal e-Learning tool.

8 - Expose our members to blogging as a method of e-Learning and allow them to
judge for themselves where it fits into their toolkit.

9 - Hopefully gain perspectives from professionals outside of our group that we
wouldn't normally here.
This makes so much sense, especially given how easy (and free) it is to get blogs together.

Have I just been missing it? Should I have created the Los Angeles eLearning SIG Blog months ago?

It would seem that the critical ingredient is participation. Ben obviously is really helping the Phlesig take off. But it does seem like we may all be missing an opportunity. Thoughts?

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2007/01/new-kind-of-lms.html Some interesting thinking going on by Lee Kraus and Mark Oehlert around where the LMS is going to need to go if we really are going to allow for small content chunks that can be quickly accessed.

I personally think that the LMS is quickly being relegated to longer, developmental activities and compliance activities. I've talked about some of these problems before:

When I looked at what Lee and Mark had to say, I find myself nodding my head in agreement that there has to be a different kind of LMS that will emerge. It will be much more like a combination of Communication, Search Support and Web Analytics (for tracking), and less like the current self-contained entities that are today's LMS. It won't get in your way when you want to get to information, but may come up along the side to show you other resources. It will track your access of content of various forms without login, provide suggestions for additional content, suggest learning paths based on what you are doing. It's going to be on-the-side and below your activities, not on-top.

I here a lot of what I'm saying in what Lee and Mark had to say. I'll be curious to see if anyone is actually trying to make this happen.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2007/01/mapping-five-things-meme.html If you are interested in the viral spread of ideas through the blogosphere, take a look at Mark's Mapping the Five Things Meme.

Of course, this started long before me and has gone through virtually all parts of the blogosphere. It's fascinating to think about the implication of this kind of idea spread. It's also fascinating to realize the speed that ideas can now move.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2007/01/information-needed-do-you-read. Additional words of wisdom (hopefully a bit more obscure than the last quote):

I don't make things difficult. That's the way they get, all by themselves.

I've previously asked How People Interact with Blogs? about basic interaction with blogs and received some interesting responses.

However, as I've been using CoComment more, I'm beginning to believe that most blog readers come to a blog and see the comments that exist at the time they get there. Even if they leave a comment, they may never return to see any others. As a blog author (and commenter) it makes it hard because I don't know if the person will see my response.

So I'm hoping people could tell me:

a. Do you read comments?
b. Do you ever go back to a blog to see comments later?
c. Do you use a mechanism such as CoComment to track conversations?
d. Do you ever leave a comment and not come back to see what was said?

FYI - I'm still trying to help this out via an on-going discussion list via CoComment. Find out more at:
eLearning Technology: eLearning Discussions - An Attempt at Better Discussions in the Blogosphere

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2007/01/big-question-for-january-qualit The Big Question on the LCB for January is:

What are the trade offs between quality learning programs and rapid e-learning and how do you decide?
There's a lot involved in this question and I plan to revisit it several times during the month. I'm hoping to see some contributions that will help thinking.

Let me start with some important words of wisdom that I like to use at meetings:
You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
Props to the first person to leave a comment that identifies the source of this quote.

Only slightly more seriously, consider the following graph that I often use in presentations to illustrate a point:




Expenditure on training has a limit on the performance gains you can achieve. After a certain point, the cost of the Training exceeds the value of the performance gains. And often there's an minimum level that you can do where anything below that level would cause too many problems. This graph is completely over-simplified to make a point. In reality, there are many different ways we could make our expenditure and each one would have a different cost and effect on performance.

So, the real challenge posed by the Big Question is knowing when its really worth it to spend dollars on what we might consider a higher quality solution than providing something simpler that we know won't be as effective at improving performance.

And this isn't a theoretical question - it's something we face all the time. We are pretty sure that people will learn less from a rapid eLearning piece that's basically just a PowerPoint + Audio as compared to an hours worth of fun, interactive courseware. But, if the cost is significantly higher, is it really worth it? In what cases?

And it's not just an ROI question. Often, there's a lot more to What Clients Really Want than business outcomes that can be quantified into dollars.

In my mind, there's clearly no easy answer to this question. I'll be curious to see some of the ways that people attack this over the next few days.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2006/03/elearning-resources.html Free eLearning Resources:

http://www.janeknight.com/resources/freebooks.html - Free eLearning Books list

eLearning Trends:

Hot Topics in Training - A Crude (but mildly interesting) Analysis - Gives an overview of what topics are being discussed now as opposed to in 2005.

Resource List Posts:

eLearning Technology: Rapid eLearning Tools - List of Rapid eLearning Development Tools

eLearning Technology: Virtual Classroom Instruction - Resources - Resources on better virtual classroom instruction.

eLearning Technology: Discussion Resources for Learning Professionals - Discussion groups for learning professionals.

eLearning Technology: Software Simulation eLearning (w/ links to Tools) - Articles and tools for creating software training eLearning.

eLearning Technology: eLearning Blogs - Quick Way to Find Good Ones

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

January 26, 2007

http://education.guardian.co.uk/schoolmeals/story/0,,1999317,00.html?gu Children vulnerable to eating disorders are being put under increased pressure by the government's school dinner reforms, teaching union warns.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/comment/story/0,,1999014,00.htm Peter Wilby: New Labour's education policies have undermined the goal of a meritocracy and the comprehensive principle now faces defeat.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/news/story/0,,1999507,00.html?gu High levels of stress widespread throughout further and higher education, a survey of lecturers shows.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/worldwide/story/0,,1999424,00.ht Battle between opposition and government supporters at university leaves at least four students dead and 35 wounded.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,,1999417,00.html?gusrc= A project to encourage schools to run fair trade tuck shops has been hit by new healthy eating guidelines. Claudia Cahalane reports.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/news/story/0,,1999628,00.html?gu Employers twice as likely to pay for staff to do foundation degrees at university than college, figures show.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

January 27, 2007

 While the article is high-level, it's a really interesting set of perspectives on things that will be happening in the next few years. Likely you are seeing several of these already.

The HBR List - Breakthrough Ideas for 2007

FYI - I read somewhere that the article would only be available for a limited time for free.

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

January 29, 2007

http://scormwatch.typepad.com/blog/2007/01/rustici_softwar.html

Logo_rustici_software_logo_gold
NASHVILLE, Tenn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Rustici Software's SCORM Test Track application is the first product to be certified as officially conforming to the newest standards for e-learning. The latest release of the Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) is SCORM 2004 3rd Edition, launched recently by a joint commission known as the Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) Initiative. The U.S. Department of Defense initiative is comprised of government, academic and business representatives; its SCORM project consists of specifications that allow shared content and interoperability of online learning.


"ADL is delighted to see Rustici's adoption of the new SCORM 2004 3rd Edition," said Paul Jesukiewicz, Deputy Director of the ADL Initiative. "We're pleased to see Test Track was the first application to be officially certified as SCORM 2004 3rd Edition by one of the ADL Test Centers. Having products such as Test Track will provide the global ADL community the necessary tools to ensure interoperability across e-learning content and learning management systems."


The latest version of SCORM is more robust and complete than the preceding edition in that it corrects issues, resolves ambiguities dealing with interoperability, and incorporates changes based on accredited standards.


"We were pleased to be the first to be certified," said Mike Rustici, co-owner of Rustici Software, the leading provider of products and services that help e-learning clients conform to SCORM specifications. "Third Edition added a number of new requirements for a Learning Management System (LMS), mostly centered around increasing interoperability and providing a usable interface for the learner. These are things we have historically done very well."


SCORM Test Track allows creators of e-learning materials to experience their content exactly as their users will, in a "real" certified LMS. It also allows users to debug content using Test Track's advanced diagnostic information, to demonstrate content's compatibility to clients, and to iteratively develop and test the newest SCORM sequencing rules. Test Track has already surpassed one thousand users. SCORM Test Track is built on the core code found in the SCORM Engine, Rustici Software's flagship product, which has been integrated into more than 45 different LMS systems. It is considered a leader in compatibility and learner experience, in addition to conforming to strict standards.


"Test Track gives content developers an opportunity to create intricate content effectively," Rustici said. "The real power, though, is that content authors and consumers can be certain about compatibility."


For more information about Rustici Software, visit http://www.scorm.com.

Filed under: SCORM

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share

January 31, 2007

http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2007/01/astd-techknowledge-2007-opening I’m at the opening session at ASTD TechKnowledge (http://tk07.astd.org). I’ll soon be doing a session on Blogging and Social Bookmarking for Personal and Group Learning.

Tony Bingham, President of ASTD, is doing his introduction, and his content is: Web 2.0, personal learning, easy distribution of software (software as a service), video is here now, push to pull, teaching Gen Y (what he calls the netGeneration). What a great setup for my presentation. Thanks Tony. And, it’s somewhat surprising to see a relatively slow moving organization, ASTD, driving this discussion.

One thing that struck me was his point of relevant vs. perfect. He was part of the team that worked on Britannica Online. He openly questions whether the goal of perfection (think as compared to Wikipedia) should be the primary. To me this relates closely to the question of speed vs. quality.

Thorton May is now up. He has verbal ADD. He only gets half way through a sentence and stammers a few words and then starts the next. A couple of major points: The number one skill set of the future is the ability to learn. Everyone needs to go back to school (interesting that he assumes that going back to school will help).

Posted by Paul Coyne | 0 comment(s)
Bookmark and Share